🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat say that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the issue is creating unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Ancient Graveyards

Local authorities have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being swallowed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation sets out a series of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer sites. Authorities maintain it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They intended this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the coast lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while serving overseas. His mother said she lost sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does trouble me to consider this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to handle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Several families want more sea defences to delay the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to continue for now. Others contend the time for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with residents.”

He added there was time to consider all the options. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need productive local conversations to discover the right solutions for each community.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in life after death, providing a spiritual perspective on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.