🔗 Share this article

The beluga known as Jelly Bean’s daughter Bertie Botts is an cute small “ham sandwich”. Orion – nicknamed “Onion Ring” – is a sizeable but guardian-like friend. Zephyr has “endless energy” and sways like a wiggly creature. Lillooet is the “biggest cuddle bug” with a heart of gold.

A group of thirty enclosed beluga whales in a Canada-based entertainment facility have been caught in a tussle between a defunct facility, public officials and welfare campaigners.

But those working directly with the whales say the impassioned debate over their fate often overlooks the nuances of the whales who, after living their entire lives in confinement, have been carefully observed by the humans who work with them regularly.

After the Canadian government disallowed the transfer of the belugas to China, the struggling attraction near Niagara Falls where they are kept stated it would consider to euthanize them unless the authorities covers the upkeep of keeping them alive. The nation’s fisheries minister has rejected that demand, placing the thirty whales in an ever more uncertain position.

Highly Cognitive Marine Mammals

Scientists say that belugas’ neural makeup, along with their mimicry abilities, intellectual tasks and group interactions indicate they are deeply intelligent animals – something a former trainer discovered directly.

She spent several years as a whale caretaker, a position that involved gaining confidence of the marine predators.

“Building up those connections over time takes a lot of regularity and a lot of care. At the beginning, they’re very cautious of you,” she said. “Over time, you gain shared confidence. And they start being more vulnerable with you. It’s just so wonderful and gratifying.”

The trainer knew the whales were very smart, but she says she was even so astounded by the nuances and quirks in their characters. She developed a deep bond for two female belugas with opposing temperaments.

“One whale accepted me. Cleo demanded work,” she said. “Each transformed the way I perceive relationships.”

Public Concerns and Facility Decline

Burgess’s interaction with the whales developed against a backdrop of rising activist criticism to their captivity.

During her three years at the park, seven belugas and the park’s one killer whale, the orca, passed away. In total, nineteen belugas have died at the park since 2019, a statistic which the facility ascribes to expected lifespan, but which activists say reflects the inadequate care in which they were maintained.

The park did not admit visitors to the guests over the recent season, but Burgess says she saw with her own eyes effects of the cessation. “Concrete is falling apart from the enclosures because they’re falling apart and not being repaired. The whales are curious and so they pick it up and move about with fragments in their mouth. It’s upsetting to see.”

The park did not reply to a questionnaire, but earlier asserted: “The whales … obtain far superior health care and around the clock attention than any individual in the Britain, or other places.”

Fate in Limbo and Potential Resolutions

Burgess was terminated from the facility in the spring following the passing of Eos, an unwell beluga the caretakers had to put down. She said the park suspected details of the death were disclosed to the news outlets and she was let go not long after.

The uncertainty over the whales’ fate has left her and staff members in distress. She says the facility’s warning to euthanize its whales is a negotiation tactic and is a “logistically impossible” endeavor, adding any efforts to put down even a single beluga would require “significant personnel”, vehicles and machinery.

“There’s no way in hell the staff would ever do it,” she said.

Burgess advocates for requests for the whales to be removed immediately from the facility, with its failing enclosures and dwindling staff.

In the autumn, Canada’s government official turned down a bid to send the whales to an overseas location.

“Allowing the request would have meant a ongoing life in confinement and a reversion to public entertainment,” the official stated. “As society, we know that marine mammals are meant for the ocean, not in pools for our enjoyment. I could not in good conscience authorize an export that would prolong the conditions these belugas have suffered.”

But the former trainer said the minister’s comments reveal a wider misunderstanding of the facts of life for belugas living their whole lives in enclosures.

“The people needs to realize these are whales that have lived entirely in confinement and they will need human care for the foreseeable future,” she said. “Many just don’t understand that it’s not as simple as saying ‘shut it down’.”

Sanctuary Proposal and Continuing Discussion

As authorities work to find a solution, ideas have surfaced, some of which have questionable practicality. A suggested plan called for the belugas to be let go into the natural habitat of Canada’s north – where whales are a key source of nourishment for Inuit communities.

A planned sanctuary in the province of eastern Canada, which now received official endorsement, has been contentious. The prospective location, which includes 100 acres of enclosed sea water, doesn’t yet exist. Supporters remain optimistic that it could eventually represent a long term solution for a number of the whales.

But, the former trainer says, among staff she’s consulted, there is “skepticism there” about what she said is “simply an untested concept” in the whales’ well-being.

Different voices say the prospect of a protected habitat reflects a broader global shift away from captive facilities and could represent a feasible approach in the coming months.

An official, leader of the initiative, said the location will replicate the intellectual stimulation and diet the whales obtain from trainers, albeit in a significantly bigger environment. He said after the health of whales is thoroughly evaluated, which could take months|an extended period|